The Gibson ES Les Paul Memphis Electric Guitar Review – The new Classic “ES” is completely free for personal use, and it would help a LOT if you could help a little bit (you can change the suggested amount in the next screen) to assist me to run the site and the occasional set of strings!

The Gibson ES Les Paul Memphis Electric Guitar Review – The new Classic “ES”

In all the years I’ve been playing guitar, I’ve levitated towards Les Pauls, SGs, Explorers, Strats, Teles, and so many more iconic bodies and configurations. The Gibson ES series (Electro-Spanish) has always been a desire, but something out of reach. The ES lines of guitars are premium instruments, generally priced north of most nice Les Pauls and even some LP customs. I think the studio ES models are OK, but they just aren’t like ESs to me… I love neck and body binding on them and I love the great lacquer finishes Gibson offers on the non-studios. As such, I’ve really kind of stayed away from new retail ES guitars… until 2014.
I was surprised one day to be trolling the Gibson guitar home site (opens a new window) and saw something I’d never seen before: a Les Paul called the ES Les Paul – best of both worlds. It wasn’t long before I’d saved up and bought a 2014 ES Les Paul in Light Caramel Burst. Wow. It hit me like a ton of bricks and I really fell in love with the whole idea, right away.

Quick Opinion:  I think describing my first hour with my special-order 2014 Les Paul could be best described in a “first impressions” kind of format. I was really blown away.
* First thought: WOW this thing is seriously light compared to any Les Paul I own of any kind. What a delight.
* First strum (acoustic) felt as though I had a living thing in my hands. The resonant feedback to my hands and my chest was truly sensuous. I was delighted with the way the ES LP sang with open strings and fretted notes!
* When plugged in amplified, I found the ES LP to be somewhat similar to the ES 339 and ES 127, but lighter and more airy. It could be pushed to get blues snotty, caressed to be jazzy and new-agey, picked to be either rock or country. Name your poison: it does it to the nines.
* After fiddling with tone, volume, tunings, and general noodling with sound, I took time to just take the instrument all in with my eyes and hands: It’s really quite beautiful to behold.
VividPeaceGibsonESLesPaulHeadstockBack Please visit my sponsor and buy something from them after clicking one of my links! Those click-throughs don’t count for me when some big internet site out there has zZounds ads and you click on theirs! It helps feed my gear, my music, and makes this free site run!

I’ll go into more detail in the rest of the review. With that said, suffice it to say that I not only loved the new design concept, its execution is pretty much flawless. I love it so much so that I regretfully sold my first (the Caramel 2014) and took the time to find just the right cherry burst 2015 on the market almost two years later. My newer one, the 2015 “Memphis Belle” is in my sound library until it is passed on to my family after my time has come.

Playability: To be clear: each neck is hand-shaped and finished from a pre-form blank. Not all Gibson necks are the same… That’s one of the great reasons to own MORE THAN ONE of the same kind ;-). My first ES Les Paul, the 2014, and my current ES Les Paul, the 2015, have virtually the same neck carve, except that the 2015 is definitely thicker feeeeeelingggggg. Your mileage might vary, depending on what you like, the size of your hands, and the actual neck shape at the time of manufacture. Gibson calls it a “Rounded C Profile neck.” With that said, let’s describe the ones I’ve actually owned…
Want to take a look at the other ES guitars on zZounds guitars? Buy one here! Please visit my sponsor!
If you like the traditional old-school 50s thicker neck, the ES Les Paul is for you. It’s a nice hand-carved shape that resembles the neck thickness of my 2010 LP Traditional, my 2016 LP Traditional, and my Gibson Les Paul Custom. I like almost any kind of neck, but this one is my favorite, right up there with the Stratocaster 50’s V neck and my Fender Soft-D Tele Deluxe neck. The ES Les Paul 50s neck is substantial, but doesn’t feel like a baseball bat or bass neck at all. If they made these with 60s necks or even slim-taper Firebird necks, that would be fine… I just prefer the thicker kind…

Nicest play-ability thing when you play standing for hours? It’s LIGHT. WOW is it light. You see it and think “heavy like a non-weight-releived body or heavy like a big ol’ ES 335 with maple ply”… and then you strap it and put the strap on your shoulder and feel like it’s an acoustic in weight. VERY nice. I can play Memphis Belle all day long and my shoulder is none the more sore.

I do play finger-style mostly, with some picking styles and lots of hybrid claw styles (pick and fingers are REALLY fast for some things!). Given the traditional neck width and nut width, the ES Les Paul is a finger-picker’s delight, without costing the pick-picker to lose her/his mind when sweeping, economy-picking, or alternating up-stroke and down-stroke. Memphis Belle has a GREAT balance of string spacing to fingerboard width.

The neck, the fingerboard, the binding on the body’s front edging: all are comfy and make the guitar feel like it was made to be played. As a guitar player with joint issues, Memphis Belle is really so very pleasant that I forget I’ve got a guitar in my hands sometimes – the ES Les Paul is just an extension of my musical mind…

Sound: There are many components to sound quality in an instrument. The “sound” portion of this review deserves a little more depth than usual because the ES Les Paul’s sound is complex and very versatile – it can be different depending on how you play it and how you amplify it.
1) Pickups/electronics
2) Tone woods, body, neck
3) Semi Hollow with just enough of a center block

Pickups and Electronics The Gibson ES Les Paul for 2014-2016 has Memphis Heritage Spec humbuckers (also called MHS Humbuckers). The MHS humbucking pickups are true to their name in that they are virtually self-noise-silent in the signal chain. Nice. From one of Gibson’s own pages, it lists the pickups as “MHS unpotted humbuckers.” I don’t get in front of a 100wx2x4x10 Marshall Stack any more, so I’m not really worried about microphonics. I don’t have one any more, so sorry, readers, I can’t test it out for you to see if the humbuckers will allow feedback. Since they’re covered with nickel Gibson covers, I don’t know if it would be much of a problem.

Please visit my sponsor and buy something from them after clicking one of my links! Those click-throughs don’t count for me when some big internet site out there has zZounds ads and you click on theirs! It helps feed my gear, my music, and makes this free site run!
The wiring in my ES Les Paul is hand-soldered point-to-point old-school wiring and solder and capacitors. The potentiometers are non-splitting and feel and act like older unbalanced tone-to-volume resistance. I like it just like it is. It sounds fantastic and I wouldn’t have it wired any other way. (By the way, I put speed knobs on mine because I have a terrible time gripping slippery smooth-edged top hat/witch hat knobs.)
The sound. Oh! The sound! I can dig in with a thicker pick or metal pick through some hotter pre-amp 12ax7 tubes and get bluesy snotty snarly sounds in a skinny minute. The mid-position (both neck and bridge humbuckers {or treble and bass humbuckers for the old-school folks}) sounds the most balanced for most kinds of playing. The neck is decidedly jazzy and very thick and creamy. The bridge, when played alone, likes to honk a little like old unpotted PAF vintage, low-resistance pickups. With that said, you can dial in the tubes and your playing style and get a nice rock or country or blues lead from slapping the pickup selector towards the floor. The bridge isn’t quite right for jazz unless you thicken it up with a chorus, phase, or flange pedal. Stereo pedals all the more.

When finger-picked, I can get DELIGHTFUL jazz and new age sounds out of clean channel stuff with the 12ax7s dialed down and using a nice clean boost such as a Beano from Analog Man or the unsung hero the Seymour Duncan Pickup Booster. (Funny, I have four different pickup boosters/clean boosters for varieties of punch and clean stuff and for rock and blues… I like having a choice…) I can use any of the three switch positions to benefit song-like melody passages, bird-like counter-melodies and “color tracks,” and the beautiful mellow warm sound of a cleanly-played and not-over-effects-pedaled neck pickup. I love the electronics in my ES Les Paul. It’s VERY different from my BurstBuckers, 57s, 59s, or moderns.


When I hybrid-pick, I can get varied sounds out of the same amp/pedal/pre-amp settings, just by the shape of the pick motion, the difference between finger flesh and fingernail, and pick. More so than just any guitar with those different picking styles and parts: it’s VERY expressive and can be really coaxed into very different sounds when amplified or run through a great modeller.


Please visit my sponsor and buy something from them after clicking one of my links! Those click-throughs don’t count for me when some big internet site out there has zZounds ads and you click on theirs! It helps feed my gear, my music, and makes this free site run!

Tone woods: The Gibson ES Les Paul body is made in the traditional ES Memphis way: Pressed 3-ply woods with a carved top and lovely flamed maple on the top. The back and sides are individual pieces, much like the way an acoustic is made, with a flat surface on both. The wood is nicely thick with maple-birch-maple ply layers. The body’s box is made, then a mahogany center block with Les Paul weight relief for feedback protection, anchoring the tail-piece and bridge, and enabling a thicker, more sustaining sound. The neck is a lovely mahogany one-piece unit with a nice chocolaty-red-brown rosewood fretboard. This overall combination gives you a hybrid between the playability of a Les Paul, the weight of an acoustic, and the sound basis of an ES 3-series Gibson. It plays and sounds like the woods were lovingly picked out by a master luthier for their appearance AND tone.

Speaking of the neck, the 2015 ES Les Paul has a bone nut, replacing the modern corian nut. It tunes, plays, and sounds nice!
Re-imagining Semi-hollow Guitars: Since the ES Les Paul has the open design of a hollow body blended with the sound block of a solid body, sustain really comes to call in this guitar. Compared to either of my (truly hollow) hollow body guitars, the open strings sing noticeably longer with the ES Les Paul. Nice balance of mellow open sound combined with good sustaining while lacking the (not friendly to most guitarists) floating bridge on my true hollow body guitars.

Quality:Frankly, I have not found a single flaw with either my 2014 or my 2015 Gibson ES Les Paul. The finish around the body where the neck is inserted lacks the somewhat (unfortunately) typical bumpy spots I see on many set-neck guitars. The consistency of the wonderful nitrocellulose lacquer finish on the back and sides is superb. The fret shape, cut, and thickness is just right. I had no string buzz at all, even after I changed the strings out to some D’Addario half-flat jazz strings. This, even without having too high an action…

The case is above par, smells great, and does a nice job fitting this odd bird. Great! The tuners are REALLY old school, with green keystone keys and old-school push-in bushings. You’d think the ES Les Paul was built back in the 50s. The fingerboard inlays are super sharp-edged, and feel great. The nickel (or chrome, I can’t tell) finish on the hardware is perfect: hard, smooth, and mirror shiny.

I love the new “F Hole” stamped truss rod cover!

VividPeaceGibsonESLesPaulHeadstockBack Please visit my sponsor and buy something from them after clicking one of my links! Those click-throughs don’t count for me when some big internet site out there has zZounds ads and you click on theirs! It helps feed my gear, my music, and makes this free site run!
Value: Dollar-for-dollar, the Gibson ES Les Paul is priced right for its quality, appointments, the Memphis manufacture, and position in the ES and Les Paul product lines.

To be sure, the Gibson ES Les Paul is a premium-value and mid-premium price guitar when purchased above $3000 new at retail. It’s a real heirloom guitar, so I think it’s worth it. It will, however, be unreachable by some guitar enthusiasts. For those who can’t pay the “new” price, you can VERY patiently watch the used market for just the right color and condition. My first ES Les Paul was $2999 out the door, my second was used and was $1999 (a very good price for the new condition of the Memphis Belle).

VividPeaceGibsonESLesPaulBodyBack2If you want an ES and have enough money for an ES, the delightful ES Les Paul is much lighter and easier to play than the traditional ES-335. It’s worth a lifetime of playing.
Wishes: Gibson, I love thee and I love all my favorite American guitar builders: please offer the ES Les Paul with traditional nibbed binding-over-fret-end neck binding. Gosh! The one thing that made me sell my 2014, only to find that subsequent models have the same design. I’ll live with it, but that’s really my ONLY wish for this guitar. Maybe, just maybe it would be nice if the bridge pickup had a little thicker sound somehow.
VividPeaceGibsonESLesPaulHeadstockBack Please visit my sponsor and buy something from them after clicking one of my links! Those click-throughs don’t count for me when some big internet site out there has zZounds ads and you click on theirs! It helps feed my gear, my music, and makes this free site run!


2015-Correct Features: Just a quick jog into the specs for those of you who might not know where to find them or if the original page is gone:

Top Wood Species:    Maple, Poplar, Maple
Pieces:    3-Ply
Grade:    Figured
Binding:    Cream

Back Wood Species:    Maple, Poplar, Maple
Pieces:    3-Ply
Density:    Plain
Binding:    Cream

Body Rim Species Wood:    Maple, Poplar, Maple
Pieces:    3-Ply
Grade:    Plain
Weight Relief:    ES-LP Center Block
Average Weight (body only):    1.3925 kg / 3.070 lbs.

Body Contour
Carve:    ES-LP (Semi-Hollow)

Wood Species:    Mahogany
Pieces:    1

Truss Rod:    Historic
Profile:    Rounded “C”
Thickness at Fret 1:    21.59 mm / .850″
Thickness at Fret 12:    24.13 mm / .950″
Other Materials:    Franklin Titebond 50
Average Weight:    544.31 gm / 1.2 lbs

Type:    SP-1
Inlay:    Mother of Pearl
Logo:    Mother of Pearl “Gibson”
Silkscreen:    Gold “Les Paul Model”
Headstock Angle:    17 degrees
Tonal, Resonant, and/or Technical Effect:    The rounded neck provides an ergonomic feel and the mahogany adds a rich tonal quality

Neck Fit
Joint Angle:    4 degrees
Joint Angle Tolerance:    0 deg 0 min 15 sec
Type:    Mortise and Tenon

Style:    White
Material:    Bone
Width:    4.318 cm / 1.700″

Wood Species:    Rosewood
Pieces:    1
Shade:    Dark

Fingerboard Details
Radius:    30.48 cm / 12 ”
Frets:    22
Nut/End of Board:    4.318 cm / 1.700″ @ nut, 5.6007 cm / 2.205″ @ end of board
Scale:    62.865 cm / 24.75″
Binding:    Cream
Side Dots (Color):    Black

Fingerboard Inlays
Style:    Trapezoid
Material:    Pearloid
Dimensions:    16.51 mm x 29.718 mm / 0.66″ x 1.17 ”

Pickups    Rhythm MHS Humbucker Lead MHS Humbucker
Winds/Coil: Screw side/Slug side:    4900/5100        5200/5400
Material of Wire (gauge):    Enamel (42)        Enamel (42)
Coil Dimensions (per coil):    6.6294 cm x 1.7272 mm / 2.61″ x 0.68 ”        6.6294 cm x 1.7272 mm / 2.61″ x 0.68 ”
Coil Material:    ABS        ABS
Coil Winding Process:    Scatter Wound        Scatter Wound
Pole Piece Material:    Nickel plated steel        Nickel plated steel
Pole Piece Position from Nut:    47.4218 cm / 18.670″        59.5173 cm / 23.432 ”
Slug Material:    Nickel plated steel        Nickel plated steel
Slug Dimensions (diameter x length):    4.7498 mm x 1.24206 cm / 0.187″ x .489″        4.7498 mm x 1.24206 cm / 0.187″ x .489″
Magnet Material:    Alnico III        Alnico II
Magnet Position from Nut:    48.26 cm / 19″        58.42 cm / 23″
Magnet Dimensions:    6.35 cm x 1.27 mm / 2.5″ x 0.5″        6.35 cm x 1.27 mm / 2.5″ x 0.5″
Polarities:    Screw side is the south pole of magnet        Screw side is the south pole of magnet
Cover:    Nickel plated        Nickel plated
Qfactor:    3.21        3.2
Resistance:    7526 ohms        7963 ohms
Resonant Frequency:    2859.84 Hz        2695.19 Hz
Tonal & Resonant Advancements:
Historically accurate “Patent Applied For” replica with airy tone and unbalanced coils. Slightly under wound.

Control Pocket Assembly    Volume
Type:    CTS 500K Linear
Peak Voltage:    1080V
Range:    0-500K
Power Rating:    1/4 watt above 100K ohms
Resistance Tolerance:    500K +/- 20%
Minimum Resistance:    100 ohms

Type:    CTS 500K Audio
Peak Voltage:    1080V
Range:    0-500K
Power Rating:    1/4 watt above 100K ohms
Resistance Tolerance:    500K +/- 20%
Minimum Resistance:    100 ohms

Capacitors:    Lead Value    Rhythm Value
Orange Drop .022 mF    Orange Drop .015 mF

Tuning Keys
Style:    Kluson Single Ring Tulip Button
Material:    Body is stamped steel with plastic tulip button
Weight:    22.6796 gm / 0.8 oz

Tuning Keys Details
Tuning Ratio:    15:1

Style:    Tone Pro AVR-2
Material:    Die cast alloy
Plating Specs:    Nickel

Style:    Lightweight Stop Bar
Compensated:    No
Material:    Aluminum
Plating Specs:    Nickel

Output Jack
Style:    1/4″ mono with dual tip contact

Jack Plate
Style:    Les Paul Square
Material:    ABS – Cream
Weight:    2.0 gm / 0.07 oz

Truss Rod Cover
Style: Black and white bell with engraved F-Hole

Style:    Gold Top Hats

Dial Pointers
Yes/No:    Yes
Switch Washer
Style:    Cream with hot stamp gold

Trim Rings
Style:    Cream

Epihpone (By Gibson) ES-339 Ultra Pro Guitar Review, hands-on, in-depth, from a real player’s point-of-view is completely free for personal use, and it would help a LOT if you could help a little bit (you can change the suggested amount in the next screen) to assist me to run the site and the occasional set of strings!

Epiphone ES-339 Ultra Hands-on in-depth, experienced review

Update: I’ve since been able to find a few examples at my local guitar acquisition establishments… new pictures on-site and a few updated notes in this review…

I enjoy playing an electric guitar that has a piezo bridge in addition to one or more “traditional” magnetic pickups. I do enjoy acoustics with piezos, but an electric that has a choice of blendable magnetics and piezo(s) has sound qualities that are unique and a pleasure to the ear.

My first electric guitar with combined piezo and mag pickups was a Parker p-36. I’ve had a few of these and liked them very much. Of late, though, I’ve wanted something different, particularly something with a set neck and a different sound.

Imagine my happiness when Epiphone (Gibson) introduced a new Ultra guitar. The ES-339 Ultra was emblazoned across my email box in a drooly Gibson newsletter. I was hooked. I was due for a Christmas present for myself and decided to take the leap. I sold my current Parker P-26, added the funds from wonderful gifts from family members, and ordered a Pelham blue ES-339 Ultra from my favorite online retailer (none are available in stores yet, as I write this, some months later). Pelham blue, shaped like a small ES, anticipated Epiphone fit-and-finish, Shadow NanoMag, new series pickups from Epiphone, and vintage-looking appointments. Check. It couldn’t get here fast enough.

After I got the first ES-339 Ultra (the blue one), things went downhill…

Quick Opinion: I REALLY wanted to love this guitar and keep it in my sound library for a long time. I just couldn’t do it. And I tried more than once.

I’ll be waiting for the next version, or for one to come to a local guitar store where I can play it and handle it to be sure it is not like those I purchased.

Epiphone ES339 Ultra Pelham Blue Jim Pearson

Epiphone ES339 Ultra Pelham Blue by Jim Pearson

You can see the specs and details on the new Epiphone Ultra ES-339 here at They have a “love your guitar” guarantee – so you can buy an ES-339 Ultra and try one for yourself!

Playability: For the purposes of this review and concerning playability, I’ll leave out the quality problems I had with my Ultras for the moment.

I loved the neck profile and the light weight of the guitar. I like the small-ES shape and the way the guitar feels on the knee and on the strap. I love the thin-ness of the guitar. It’s a nice difference from my Sheraton II (which I do love…)


The Epiphone Ultra 339 compared to an Epiphone Sheraton II by Jim Pearson

The controls are usual and easy, and the pickup-type-selector (piezo, piezo+mag, mag) switch works fine and very noiselessly. Overall, I love this guitar from the standpoint of how an ES plays.

Sound: I enjoyed the sound of both of my ES-339 Ultras. Both had creamy and smooth humbucker pickups that did a good job emulating Gibson BurstBucker Pro pickups – albeit with a little less punch. They are good for most forms of rock and jazz, with OK sound for country and prog. I don’t think they’re strong enough for Metal or Alt Country, but I’m not sure that the ES-339 was really intended to be a Metal machine.

The Shadow-brand NanoMag pickup is pretty competent. It compares fairly well with a Fishman piezo – on the whole. I think the Fishman is more “acoustic” sounding and has a better louder warmer pre-amp, but the NanoMag is still a thrill to hear, particularly amplified in stereo…

I really like the blended sound of the magnetic and piezo pickups on this guitar. The warmth and breadth of the ProBucker pickups combined with the NanoMag pickup gives the guitar a unique sound that is excellent for songwriting and performing a wide array of music. I found that if I plug the magnetic output into my Bugera 55-watt tube head played through my Bugera 2×12 – and the piezo output through my Mustang V Fender head through my son’s Crate 4×12, I get a delightful blend of sounds that had me experimenting with all kinds of tweaking and combinations. It was inspiring to me – it led to some new music composed in my garage.

I do think both the ProBuckers and the NanoMag could have some more output strength. Not crunch, mind you, just more oompfh. I ended up using a tube preamp on both channels to make the guitar really stand out. I like the blended output (in the right-hand jack – take a look at the labels on the jack plate) for many recording situations, and the combined output sounded fine for play through all of my different amplifiers.

I can dig the new magnetic pickups. It’s a nice evolution of pickups that were pretty good from the start. In addition, I found the ES-339 Ultra to be a fit companion in front of 100 watts of tube power out of a 4×12 – no feedback or howling. The way this guitar was made and designed negated feedback in my garage. My Sheraton and Artcores all get some level of feedback in the same garage with the same amps.

Quality: I’m going to try to make this part of the review short. This is where my ES-339 Ultras broke my heart. If you read through this whole review, you can get an idea of my general feelings of “near miss” for this instrument.

Update 3.29.2012… I’ve since found a few at my local guitar stores, natural, cherry, and black… The quality issues were largely not present in the on-floor guitars. The paint, finish, and detail problems were non-evident in the local examples. One thing remains, however: the string buzz is still evident on every one I played. Magnetism plus neck design plus nut detail plus neck execution? Not sure. They still buzz A LOT.

I bought a Pelham blue one and returned it. I received a natural finish one (All the blues were gone! There was a 6-month backlog on order for them…) and I returned it too. I had to give up and wait for (hopefully) Epiphone to release version 2.0 of this guitar. So sad and sorry, Epiphone. I like to write about what’s best in a guitar (no matter how cheap or expensive it is) – I just can’t do that with these.

Instead of writing many paragraphs about what was wrong with my ES-339 Ultras, I’ll just do a list – note that these were NOT nit-pick issues. These were dramatic and disappointing things that shouldn’t be present in a $100 guitar, much less an $800 guitar:
* The paint wasn’t cured on the Pelham blue one. The guitar smelled like fresh paint and the paint was sticky around the F-hole.
* All but the top of the body was covered in over-spray and paint errors on the natural finish guitar. The neck, the horns, the back, and the whole front of the neck felt like sandpaper.
* The NanoMag on the natural one was dramatically quieter than the NanoMag on the blue one.
* Both of the guitars had a funny cut to the fretboard compound. There was a huge difference between the bass side at the body joint and the treble side at the body joint. At first, I thought the neck was twisted, then I got the second guitar and discovered that they were the same. The bass side strings were very high at the 20th fret in comparison to the treble side.
* Both guitars buzzed horribly up and down the entire fretboard on all strings. Even if the neck was adjusted properly (which neither were from the factory), the buzz was really and truly distressing, no matter how lightly one picked on the strings. Even if the action were raised significantly, the bass side still buzzed.
* The nut on both guitars wasn’t cut very well. The strings were very much too close to the first fret wire.
* The guitar would not allow sufficient adjustment in the TOM bridge to set the intonation any closer than 10-13 cents on five of the six strings.
* The lack of a CD with Guitar Rig on it caused me to spend more than two hours hunting the internet for where I could download the software – and a little while longer to find out where the serial number is (It’s on the inside of the battery door, NOT the control cavity plate). This was really frustrating. The information I needed was NOT in any documentation that came with the guitar in the box.

Then, there were nit-pick things. I’ll not list them here.

Needless to say, I was truly unhappy about having to go through the hassle of boxing and returning a couple of guitars and having to wait from before Christmas until well into January only to find out that both guitars were nearly unplayable.

Value: I have mixed feelings as to the value of this guitar. On the one hand, it is feature-rich for an Epiphone ES guitar. It has more features and flexibilities than any other Epi (other than the LP Ultra). On the whole, the features-per-dollar ratio is pretty good. As I’ve said in the “wishes” section of this review, I think the USB port is overkill, considering you have to use Guitar Rig to take advantage of this port, and it adds significant cost to the guitar.

I think the guitar should “street” for about $599 as it is. $649 at the most. At the time of this review, the street cost of an ES-339 Ultra is $799 – MORE than a Gibson USA faded SG, a few bucks less than a Gibson Les Paul faded studio or a Gibson 60s tribute LP or SG. Although the gadgets and very desirable pickups are great features, I don’t think this guitar feels like an $800 guitar.

With the quality issues I found on my ES-339 Ultras, I must admit I might be a bit jaded, but truly, it seemed like a lot before I even ordered the first one.

This is one of the first/few Epiphones I’ve ever played that I thought was too expensive (the others being the Prophecy line). Most Epiphones are great bargains!

Features: What’s not to like about the features? The ES-339 Ultra has a lot going for it.
* Two different pickup types on the same guitar (my reason for the season)
* Smaller, lighter ES-shaped guitar
* Semi-hollow that doesn’t howl in front of a loud amplifier
* New issue Epiphone magnetic pickups that have excellent sound qualities
* The excellent Shadow NanoMag piezo pickup
* A nice thin D-shaped neck, something like a big Telecaster neck, very similar to my Sheraton II
* EASY pickup switching with a simple momentary on-on switch built into one of the potentiometers
* The electronics are in a control cavity! Yay! No more fishing in the F-holes to fix or change the electronics!
* Simple, old-fashioned, high-quality Gibson Deluxe tuners (not Epis, but Gibbys)
* Nice general appointments and finish choices (LOVE the Pelham blue! Can’t these stay on for the long term?)
* Built-in USB port and a serial number for an older version of Native Instruments Guitar Rig
* Kudos to Epiphone for including a special stereo-capable guitar cable, a truss rod tool, and a USB cable…

This guitar is packed with features that, if executed well, make it a very interesting and fun-to-play instrument. On a scale of 1-10 for features, this guitar gets a clear and strong 10.

Wishes: I do wish I had taken great pictures of my 339 Ultras before I returned them. Perhaps later when they come out with version 2.0?

Really, the USB is more of an expensive gimmick than a real feature. Honestly, the guitar could have been more than $100 cheaper (in my opinion) without the USB port and NativeInstruments license… and the player would have better experiences with using the guitar through a more competent USB computer input from a manufacturer that does the job much better. The entire process of finding, downloading, hassling, fussing, and setting up the Guitar Rig software and trying to use it with my recording and playback software was very frustrating and did not give me nearly as good a set of results than a Line 6, M-Audio, (etc) USB interface to my computer.EpiphoneES339UltraBodyBackJimPearson

The purchaser of the Ultra 339 should not have to start out with a version of Guitar Rig that is already eclipsed by its commercial cousin. The software should be on a CD in the guitar’s new box. The software should be EASY to find on Epiphone’s and NI’s sites. The Ultra-339’s quick start guide should have a clear picture as to where to find the guitar’s Guitar Rig license number.

My biggest wish for these are that Epiphone fixes the train wreck of unusually bad quality of these instruments. On another note, I think these would be great with the simple and inexpensive addition of coil-tapped magnetic pickups and tap pot. I like the whole idea of this guitar – I just wish they were keepers.

I have to say, I’ve never been a “fan boy” of any particular brand – I like pretty much any kind of gear, particularly guitars and basses… I will play an Epiphone just as enjoyably as I will a Gibson or Fender or Rickenbacker or… With that said, I wish I could sit with Epiphone engineers and QC management and have a hands-on session about the way the examples I played came out… It is going to hurt Epi until they get this guitar’s issues under control… While I was writing this review, ALL my favorite guitar online sites had “returned” ES-339 Ultra guitars for sale… lots of them. It makes me really sad.